Due to higher voter volume this evening at both voting locations the unofficial election results will likely be available by 10 p.m. Unofficial election results will be tabulated after polls close and posted at the page below:
Please be aware that, regardless of vaccination status, all residents eligible to vote in the upcoming Municipal Election will be able to so at either the Okotoks Recreation Centre or the Foothills Centennial Centre. Voters are asked to follow mandatory Provincial public health orders by wearing a mask and maintaining 2 metres physical distancing.
Municipal elections are held every four years at which time residents elect one Mayor and six Councillors to a four year term. In Okotoks, Council members are elected at-large, which means the Mayor and Councillors represent the entire population rather than a geographical ward. Voters can choose up to six candidates for Council, and one candidate for Mayor.
Town of Okotoks Election Bylaw
Foothills Centennial Centre
204 Community Way
(for residents south of the Sheep River)
Okotoks Recreation Centre
99 Okotoks Drive
(for residents north of the Sheep River)
To be eligible to vote, an elector must be:
Free transit rides are being offered to and from Advance and Election Day voting locations (Rec Centre or Foothills Centennial Centre) for the Municipal General Election! To book your ride, enter the promo code VOTE, and your ride will be 100% discounted. Note that the promo code is available up to 4 hours before and after each voting session, except on Thanksgiving Day (Oct 11) where transit will operate from 12pm-6pm only. Your discount will appear in your account on the Okotoks Transit app. Book now as all voting days will be busy! For all general election details visit www.okotoks.ca/municipal-election.
A vote of the electors will be held on the following referendum questions under the Referendum Act:
The Town is conducting a senate election in our jurisdiction as part of the October 18, 2021 general election.
Polls close on Monday, October 18 at 8 P.M. Due to higher voter volume this evening at both voting locations the unofficial election results will likely be available by 10 P.M. Unofficial election results will tabulated and posted on www.okotoks.ca/2021-election-results as soon as they are available. Official results will be posted on this page on Friday, October 22 at noon.
The Town of Okotoks has increased advance voting opportunities to ensure all residents can easily and safely vote. All Advance Voting will take place at the Okotoks Recreation Centre (99 Okotoks Drive) on the following dates and times. Note that the Town of Okotoks does not provide for special (mail-in) ballots. Rather, to increase voting opportunities for residents, six (6) Advance Voting dates and Institutional Voting at Tudor Manor, The Heartland, and Sandstone Lodge have been scheduled.
Dates | Time |
|---|---|
| Friday, October 8 | 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. |
| Saturday, October 9 | 12:00 Noon to 6:00 p.m. |
| Monday, October 11 | 12:00 Noon to 6:00 p.m. |
| Wednesday, October 13 | 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. |
| Thursday, October 14 | 12:00 Noon to 6:00 p.m. |
| Friday, October 15 | 12:00 Noon to 6:00 p.m. |
A “vote at home” service, where two election workers visit the home of the voter to take their vote, will be provided on Friday, October 15, 2021 between the hours of 1:00 and 5:30 p.m. by appointment only. Voters requesting this service will be required to confirm they are unable to leave their home to attend a voting station or an advance voting station because of a physical disability as outlined in the Local Authorities Election Act (section 79).
To request this service, please contact Legislative Services by 12:00 noon on Wednesday, October 13, 2021 to set up an appointment.
These are nominee lists only; the Town does not endorse any candidate.
| Candidate | Contact Information | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|
| Cell: 403-860-7342 Email: info@tanyathorn.ca Website: www.tanyathorn.ca Facebook: @councillortanya Twitter: thorn4okotoks Instagram: tanya.thorn | 06/08/2021 |
| Cell: 403-336-9057 Email: naydeneformayor@outlook.com Website: naydenelewismayor.ca Facebook: @Naydene Lewis for Mayor | 08/16/2021 |
| Email: okotoksjeff@gmail.com | 08/19/2021 |
| Candidate | Contact Information | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|
| Cell: 587-586-1090 Email: gordlangforokotoks@gmail.com Facebook: Gord Lang - Running for Okotoks Council | 03/22/202121 |
| Cell: 403-874-0200 | 06/01/2021 |
| Cell: 403-703-1726 | 06/17/2021 |
| Cell: 587-888-0515 Email: oliverforokotoks@gmail.com Website: www.oliverhallmark.com Facebook: @oliverhallmarkforokotoks Instagram: @ojhallmark | 06/28/2021 |
| Cell: 403-827-8630 | 06/29/2021 |
| Cell: 403-512-2333 | 06/29/2021 |
| Cell: 403-589-2941 Email: jessicamauriceforokotoks@gmail.com Website: www.jessicamaurice.ca Facebook: @jessicamauriceforokotoks | 06/29/2021 |
| Phone: 403-390-6550 Email: info@ashleydreger.ca Website: www.ashleydreger.ca Facebook: @Ashley Dreger for Town Council Twitter: @DregerAshley Instagram: @agwDreger | 07/16/2021 |
| Cell: 587-890-8828 Email: shawna4okotoks@gmail.com Website: www.shawna4okotoks.com | 07/28/2021 |
| Cell: 403-701-0643 | 08/04/2021 |
| Cell: 403-703-7166 Email: onerheim@hotmail.com Facebook: @Daniel Onerheim - Town of Okotoks Council Twitter: @danielonerheim Instagram: @onerheimdan | 08/04/2021 |
| Email: reneeamiller@me.com Website: www.reneemiller.ca | 08/04/2021 |
| Cell: 403-336-3508 Email: JakobHensel2021@gmail.com Facebook: @Jakob Hensel for Okotoks Council | 08/10/21 |
| Cell: 403-990-6683 | 08/12/2021 |
| Cell: 403-601-1077 Email: turbobird89@gmail.com TikTok: @dustyfroom | 08/18/2021 |
| Cell: 587-437-7606 Email: trellistownofokotoks@outlook.com Website: www.trellispalmer.ca Facebook: @Trellis Palmer | 08/18/2021 |
| Cell: 403-938-6777 Email: ryan@brownfortowncouncil.ca Website: www.brownfortowncouncil.ca Facebook: @brownfortowncouncil | 08/19/2021 |
| Email: sdoublet@shaw.ca Website: sylviaforcouncil.com | 08/20/2021 |
| Cell: 403-671-4414 (call or text) Email: rachelforokotoks@gmail.com Website: www.rachelswendseid.ca Facebook: @rachelforokotoks Instagram: @rachelforokotoks | 08/23/2021 |
| Cell: 403-938-4236 Email: kenheem@telus.net Website: www.kenheemeryck.com | 08/23/2021 |
| Email: cheryl4okotoks@outlook.com | 08/30/2021 |
| Email: donmably@yahoo.com Facebook: @Don Mably-forcouncil | 08/30/2021 |
| Phone: 403-995-0800 Email: gstieben@gmail.com Website: okotokian.com | 09/20/2021 |
 HAM, Leona | ATTENTION: Leona Ham has filed a disclaimer for her candidacy for Councillor and has withdrawn her name from the race. Cell: 403-938-9499 Email: leona.okotoks@gmail.com Facebook: @Leona Ham - Okotoks Town Council Candidate | 09/20/2021 |
Some candidates have provided contact and social media information regarding their campaign. These links will take you to a third party page. The Town accepts no responsibility for the content or any risk associated with accessing this information.
Nominations can be filed as early as January 1, 2021 and continue through the year until the Nomination Period close at 12 noon on September 20, 2021.
Due to COVID-19:
Below is information prospective candidates should know about municipal elections including campaign financing, rules regarding signage, and forms you will need to complete.
Information has been assembled as a resource for prospective candidates outlining some of the strategic priorities for the current Council:
Watch this video for what you need to know if you're interested in running in the 2021 Municipal Election.
Question: What is the status of the water agreement with the County? I know they have withdrawn from the CMRB plan, but would like to know what is happening with the agreement.
Answer: The Town and the County are continuing to work collaboratively on the water pipeline design and obtaining necessary approvals from the Alberta Government. More information regarding the water pipeline project is available on the Town website here. Foothills County is a member of the CMRB.
Question: What are the existing IDPs with Foothills? Can I access them?
Answer: There is a IDP (Intermunicipal Development Plan) with Foothills County which is available on the Town website here.
Question: What is the mill rate for Okotoks as compared to the County and Calgary?
Answer: At the regular meeting on May 10, 2021, Council approved a zero percent tax rate increase for the second year in a row. Click here to view the May 2021 financial indicator Council report and here to view the analysis prepared by Alberta Municipal Affairs which compares Okotoks to another 18 comparator municipalities. Review the tax rate bylaws for 2021- Bylaw 05-21 and Bylaw 07-21.
Question: Has Okotoks entered the ‘water for life’ program, and what does that mean.
Answer: Water for life is a government grant program operated by Alberta Transportation. Information regarding the program requirements can be found on the provincial website here:
The Town of Okotoks submitted a formal application for water pipeline funding on February 13, 2015. The March 16, 2015 letter received from the Minster of Alberta Transportation in response to the funding application can be viewed here.
At the August 31, 2020 Joint Council Meeting held with Foothills County the following resolution was passed in regards to the regional water pipeline and funding applications:
Question: Has there ever been a First Nations person sit on Okotoks town council. I’m guessing that this isn’t a question that can be answered because I wasn’t required to fill out any form about my racial background, but I thought I would ask anyways.
Answer: There is no authority under the legislation to collect that information for municipal elections and in fact might be viewed as an unreasonable invasion of personal information. I encourage electors to discuss their thoughts and values directly with candidates and ensure they are voting for candidates that in their opinion will be the best fit for representation at Council.
Question: Did the town of Okotoks provide or sell land for the Cegen data center? If they don’t break ground after a year does the town have the option to buy back the land like they did with the distillery?
Answer: The Town has only entered into a conditional agreement with CEGEN at this point. As the criteria under that conditional agreement have not been met, a legal agreement to proceed has not been enacted. This conditional agreement is protected from disclosure under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.
Question: In regard to the answer on #1, the motion 20.C 349 does not specifically mention the Water for Life Program. Can you clarify when the motion refers to grant approval does that satisfy the requirement of the WFL program that a council motion needs to be made to start the WFL process? Since this is a new project and not the Calgary to Okotoks pipeline, does this need a new application to the WFL program or would it carry over from the 2015 application?
Answer: The Town application for water for life was submitted in 2015 for the Calgary to Okotoks pipeline.
In March of 2017, the Town was advised we are not eligible for water for life and advised to switch over to the Alberta Municipal Water/Wastewater Partnership (AMWWP) grant. On March 24, 2017 we were advised that the grant application was on hold until such time as a solution is found. This meant that the maximum grant would be between 45-55% vs the 90% under the water for life grant funding. The application was placed on hold by Alberta Transportation. The Province will not fund any project that has not received approval by Alberta Environment and Parks (AEP) and AEP was now requiring a water license transfer for Calgary to share their water.
The 2018 AMWWP grant application was on hold until AEP approval was given. The grant application was updated in provincial grant system.
The 2019 AMWWP grant application was on hold until AEP approval was given. The grant application was updated in provincial grant system.
The 2020/2021 revised grant application was submitted. AEP endorses the application and indicates its eligibility. Response received can be viewed here.
In 2021, with the inclusion of the Town of Nanton, the project could be eligible for water for life funding as it now meets the definition of regional (under the funding criteria of the water for life program an urban partner is required). Okotoks is in discussions with the Town of Nanton to explore the possibility of partnering for this water solution. Alberta Transportation does not consider Foothills County as meeting the required urban thresholds.
A policy challenge by the Town was sent to the Minister of Transportation and the Minister of Municipal Affairs to attempt to resolve this issue.
Question: If the water issue was a result of a faulty sensor, do you know why the water ban remains?
Answer: Because the reservoir level sensor was providing inaccurate readings, a reservoir basically went to empty on Sunday, August 15, 2021. That reservoir needed to regain that lost quantity over the next few days to ensure it had reached a water level across all reservoirs to become stable once again. In addition, the Town was required by the province to have an adequate volume of water to flush the zone 4 that was under the Boil Advisory. The Town has now completed all work and will be lifting the outdoor water ban shortly.
Question: I have recently had a question about the tentative agreement between the RCMP and the government regarding the wage increase and retro pay. I’m wondering if there is a plan already set by the current government to cover the costs of these increases or minutes where this was discussed previously.
Answer: This issue was recently discussed at the August 16, 2021 Council Meeting. The report and attachments can be found here.
Question: I am just wondering what constitutes 3rd party advertising? An event is being put on by a group different than a candidate’s campaign. Can you provide me some clarity on this? Who's disclosure would it need to be on?
Answer: Under Part 8 of the Local Authorities Election Act (LAEA), section 162(1)(d) and (3), “election advertising” is defined. Generally “election advertising” for third party advertising “means under section 162(1)(d), subject to subsection (3), the transmission to the public by any means during an election advertising period of an advertising message that promotes or opposes the election of a candidate…”.
If a group is conducting this type of advertising on behalf of a candidate it should be registering as a third party under this part of the LAEA when it has incurred expenses or accepted advertising contributions of at least $1,000 under section 163(1). This type of advertising will need to include the third party advertiser’s name(s) and contact information. In addition to identifying the third party of a particular advertisement, the purpose of requiring contact information in advertisements is to enable electors to contact third parties and ensure that they are accountable for their advertisements.
Alberta Municipal Affairs outlines third party advertiser responsibilities. As a candidate you are not responsible for including advertising expenses incurred by third party advertisers on your Candidate Disclosure Statement. Although, as a candidate, you should be aware of these provisions and encourage any third parties advertising on your behalf to comply with these requirements.
Complaints or allegations of third party advertising occurring outside of the LAEA under Part 8 can be lodged with the Election Commissioner.
Question: I am still confused about this. If my friends are hosting a public event that is a fundraiser for me as a Candidate but includes any Candidates who wish to participate, is that illegal?
Answer: As a candidate you will need to follow the fundraising function provisions under section 147.31 of the Local Authorities Election Act and account for, issue receipts, and disclose as required under the legislation. Extending invitations to other candidates to an event being held as a fundraiser for you as a candidate does not negate compliance with fundraising, reporting or advertising provisions. As long as you follow the legislated provisions, holding a fundraiser for your campaign as a public event is not illegal. If you still have specific questions regarding fundraising, it might be helpful to call and speak to an election advisor at Alberta Municipal Affairs toll-free by first dialing 310-0000 and calling 780-427-2225.
Question: Could I please trouble you to confirm the dates for the advances election polls? I know the dates for the candidates forum keeps changing (which is not a Town organized event - I appreciate), but in addition to questions about the candidates forums, I am also fielding questions about the dates for the advanced election polls.
Answer: Voter information can be found on the Town of Okotoks Election webpage under the ‘Voter Information' tab, and is copied below. Further advertising of advance voting and voting dates will be conducted after the close of nomination day.
Question: What is in place in regards to HR policies, recreation, transportation and housing for individuals with disabilities?
Answer: Human Resources - We follow all applicable legislation such as Duty to Accommodate and Human Rights, they are built into our HR practices and processes. Our Personnel Policy and Respectful Workplace Administrative Guideline both have provisions to protect persons with disabilities against discrimination in alignment with Human Rights. On the Town's careers page we commit to being a respectful and inclusive workplace, encouraging applications from all qualified individuals. We have also work with local advocacy groups to place individuals with disabilities
Recreation - All Recreational based programs including day camps and the school age care program are welcoming and inclusive. From day camps to the licensed child care the Town of Okotoks is committed to offering programs that are inclusive to all. We work with FSCD (Family Support for Children with Disabilities) to ensure that appropriate support is provided to children and families in our programs. We have been a partner agency with Between Friends for many years and register day camp leaders into their programs so they can appropriately support the children with diverse needs in our programs. Day camp leader training includes inclusion training - this philosophy promotes the participation of a child within a registered program rather than stand-alone programs.
Programs addressed a request and offered teen / adult inclusive dance classes. These programs have been very popular and provide options for diverse abilities. These classes were offered pre COVID and are being re-introduced in the fall program line up with yoga also added as an option.
During COVID a Federal grant enabled the Town of Okotoks to install equipment that enabled remote programming options. These options address mobility / travel challenges / health issues such as COVID concerns. Our experienced and supportive instructors have the ability to connect and support clients in a variety of programs and activities.
Parks - The new Municipal Development Plan speaks to Universal Design (page 93, Neighborhood Design) which is echoed throughout the document. Parks is mandated on page 159, Section 7.5 c, to provide rich, accessible recreation and leisure opportunities for residents.
The Recreation Master Plan also speaks to providing fully accessible playground locations in strategic locations on page 59 of the pdf (which we have done in Riverside Park) and supports number 4 of the 6 the principles provided in the Recreation Master Plan in guiding the vision for open spaces as noted below:
Community Wellness supports full accessibility in programs in various ways. Not all have policy attached to them, but it is an integral part of our program design and delivery.
Volunteer Resource Centre - The volunteer handbook has a section on accessibility: “The Okotoks Volunteer Resource Centre is committed to providing equitable opportunities to volunteers with disabilities by being accessible and creating a welcoming, barrier free environment where everyone feels valued, respected and supported.”
The Volunteer Resource Centre has worked with groups such as Foothills Advocacy in Motion (FAIIM) to ensure there are volunteer opportunities that allow all individuals to have a meaningful and positive experience. In addition when each new volunteer in interviewed the Volunteer Administrator will support them in finding a placement that aligns with their skills and interests, and will ensure any required accommodations are made.
Community Access Program - Seniors (60 years of age and over) and adults with permanent disabilities are able to remain active participants in the community through the Community Access Program. A subsidy is provided to a contracted taxi company for each trip taken and provides users with a reduced taxi fare. Cardholders who require a wheelchair accessible vehicle for transportation are able to book one.
Okotoks Transit - Accessibility is currently identified in 2 places on our transit website. Firstly in the FAQ section (screenshot below) and secondly in the new vehicle video.
Age Friendly Okotoks Subcommittee - The Age Friendly Okotoks Subcommittee was formed to make Okotoks a more age friendly community, a place where all residents participate as full and meaningful community members. Accessibility and ensuring that all services are inclusive for all people is part of this initiative. Click here to view Council's resolution.
Social Wellness Framework - In January 2010, the Town of Okotoks undertook the development of a Social Wellness Framework, which identified key components of social wellness. Baseline indicators with measures were established and it was recommended that the indicators be monitored in five year increments to track process. In 2020 the update report highlighted major accomplishments and next steps. Multiple recommended focus areas included inclusion and accessibility as part of the work that is being and will continue to be completed:
Okotoks Family Resource Centre - Family Resource Centre Specialists will provide outreach visits and support to individuals who have a barrier that prevents them from accessing the office. In addition they will work with each client individually to employ different methods of communication and support that allow for all people to access their services.
Question: What was the cost outlay for Okotoks Transit? What are the operating costs? What is the revenue?
Answer: The facilitation of a local transit system that allows for all residents, including those without access to personal vehicles, to have affordable and accessible options to travel within Okotoks for work, health and personal business was identified in a number of master plans. Over the past 3 years, Town Administration researched a number of alternatives for local transit systems that considered the following key variables: financial impacts, value for dollar expended, and environmental impacts.
After consideration of all variables the current “Okotoks on-Demand” program was implemented. The capital and implementation costs (including the cost of the vehicles) totaled $0.880M of which 2/3 funding was provided through provincial Green Trip funding grants.
The 2020 operating budget for the newly launched “On-Demand” local transit system was based a total of 18,000 rides in 2020. The total projected revenue for the local transit system was $0.031M and total projected operating expenditures was $0.854M for an overall projected tax subsidy of $0.823M.
During the 2020 operational year, the on-demand transit system met and surpassed projected ride expectations, with a total of 27,402 rides being completed. The service was planned for 2 vehicles in operation at all times, whereas due to high demand we operated up to 3 vehicles at times throughout the year. The actual revenue for 2020 was $0.081M and the actual operating expenditure was $0.817M, for an overall tax subsidy of $0.736M.
Okotoks Transit was one of very few, if any, transit operations in Canada that ended the year within budget while still exceeding operational targets. 2021 has seen strong, continuing growth in demand for transit, and the current budget is under review.
Question: Would you be able to break down the operational costs for Okotoks Transit into 1) Wages, 2) Maintenance and 3) Fuel?
Answer: Breakdown as follows:
Operational Costs:
Town Wages and Benefits: $0.123M
Outsourced Contract – Fuel: $0.032M
Outsourced Contract and Related Costs (drivers, call centre staff, maintenance, insurance, technology, COVID protocols): $0.626M
Amortization – Town Owned Vehicles: $0.036M
Total Operational Costs: $0.817M
Question: I have been asked to inquire about candidates and or incumbents that have spouses that work for the Town Office. Even if the said council seat holder discloses and does not vote on the council agenda items that are in conflict of interest; is it not a huge conflict having them on council and town office employee same household?
Answer: Under section 170(1) of the Municipal Government Act (MGA), pecuniary interest for a Councillor is defined as:
170(1) Subject to subsection (3), a councillor has a pecuniary interest in a matter if
(a) the matter could monetarily affect the councillor or an employer of the councillor, or
(b) the councillor knows or should know that the matter could monetarily affect the councillor’s family.
In the situation where an employee is a spouse or a partner of a Councillor, the budget for the Business Centre will be removed from the total budget, which is adopted by all of Council. The budget for the Business Centre, which will include salary and budget amounts for that spouse, will be voted on separately, with that Councillor following the process set out below under section 172(1) of the MGA. This process will be recorded in the adopted minutes for those meetings where budgets are approved with any salary or wage amounts.
Disclosure of pecuniary interest
172(1) When a councillor has a pecuniary interest in a matter before the council, a council committee or any other body to which the councillor is appointed as a representative of the council, the councillor must, if present,
(a) disclose the general nature of the pecuniary interest prior to any discussion of the matter,
(b) abstain from voting on any question relating to the matter,
(c) subject to subsection (3), abstain from any discussion of the matter, and
(d) subject to subsections (2) and (3), leave the room in which the meeting is being held until discussion and voting on the matter are concluded.
The Council Governance Framework, Policies and CAO Bylaw adopted by Council sets up the role of Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) as Council’s sole employee. The CAO’s role is to implement the policies set by Council, with the CAO responsible to Council for the implementation of those policies. There is no staff supervision by Council in regards to Administration, except for its sole employee, the CAO, which would remove any further “conflict of interest” circumstances. Section 153 of the MGA, noted below, sets out the legislated duties of Council:
General duties of councillors
153 Councillors have the following duties:
(a) to consider the welfare and interests of the municipality as a whole and to bring to council’s attention anything that would promote the welfare or interests of the municipality;
(a.1) to promote an integrated and strategic approach to intermunicipal land use planning and service delivery with neighbouring municipalities;
(b) to participate generally in developing and evaluating the policies and programs of the municipality;
(c) to participate in council meetings and council committee meetings and meetings of other bodies to which they are appointed by the council;
(d) to obtain information about the operation or administration of the municipality from the chief administrative officer or a person designated by the chief administrative officer;
(e) to keep in confidence matters discussed in private at a council or council committee meeting until discussed at a meeting held in public;
(e.1) to adhere to the code of conduct established by the council under section 146.1(1);
(f) to perform any other duty or function imposed on councillors by this or any other enactment or by the council.
Question: Is there a chart or location where I can see the tax increases that were passed by each council over the last 2-3 terms (i.e.: 10-12 years)?
Answer: All the tax bylaws setting the tax rates can be found on the Town website bylaw search function here and by scrolling to the bottom of the page to find the search function as noted below:
The tax rates are noted here for 2009 to 2021.
To provide a fuller picture, below are the Council approved Municipal Property Tax Revenue increases for the last 4 years:
Municipal Property Tax Revenue | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 |
Council Approved Increase | 3.0% | 2.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Provided also for information is the link to the Town webpage regarding property tax. You can also view an Okotoks YouTube video titled “How is Your Property Tax Levy Calculated.
Question: I would like to know what the total annual revenues are from all sources that come to the town? Then how much the total expenditures are that are spent annually ? And how much there is in reserves ( if any) for rainy day fund ?
Answer: All of the financial information you have requested can be found in the 2020 Financial Statement that it is on the Town’s website here.
In addition the 2020 Annual Report is available on the Town’s website for your reference and information here.
Question: I am hoping to host a pancake breakfast, I am wondering what the town rules are. It will be on private property and I have emailed AHS as well.
Answer: If you are hosting this event as a campaign fundraising event you will need to comply with the fundraising provisions under the Local Authorities Election Act – specifically Parts 5.1 and 8 and sections 147.31 and 172, along with any recommended Covid-19 health protocols recommended by AHS.
Fundraising events can be held on private or public properties. If an event is held on private property and is being donated, you will need to account for that as a donation to your campaign in your disclosure statement. If an event is being held on public property, you will need to book the public space and pay the regular rental rates and follow the processes, as any private individual holding an event.
Question: Could I please find out how much the Town has spent on the electrical hookups for Electric Vehicles (EV) and how much electricity costs we have incurred to date?
Answer: The Municipal Charging Stations were received as an Economic Development initiative to attract EV drivers to Okotoks’ Historic Downtown. The agreement with Sun Country stipulates that they own the chargers, which are on free loan to the Town of Okotoks with the stipulation that the Town provides electricity free of charge. Installation Costs would have been minimal, as the charging stations were provided at no cost and the installation was completed by municipal staff. It was brought forward as an Economic Development Initiative.
The total annual cost for electricity at both stations together was approximately $350 in the most recent 12 month period. This is 50% higher than the previous 12 month period (presumably due to COVID and fewer people going out in 2020), but similar to 2019. The Town’s total electrical costs for EV chargers over 4 years is approximately $1000, which is equivalent to the cost of purchasing one level 2 charging station.
Watch for more EV chargers coming out over the next few years; in response to a growing demand from EV drivers who are coming to Okotoks to spend their money. The next wave of grants supports a pay-per-use rapid charger installation program as an exciting revenue generating project for the Town.
Question: This link for information for candidates on Regional Planning is not working. Can you please have it fixed or let us know where we can look for more information on this topic for research? It gives me a "page not found" error when I look at it.
Answer: The link noted above worked when the answer was sent out but some of the website pages have been changed recently. The link has now been updated and can also be found here.
Question: Can you also provide the tax % increases approved by Council back another 4 years? I tried researching this however the numbers do not seem to align with the Alberta Open Government site nor the numbers reported in the Western Wheel.
Answer:
Municipal Property Tax Revenue | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 |
council approved increase | 4.3% | 4.8% | 1.6% | 1.7% |
Question: Is there a process whereby a resident can register a complaint with the Town in regards to the appearance of said developer fences? If so, what is the process and how does it work?
Answer: Properties with developer installed fences are the responsibility of the landowner to maintain and, as noted, there is typically a restrictive covenant registered on the property identifying the type of fence and requirement to maintain or alter the design of the fence.
A restrictive covenant basically provides some type of restriction on a property. In this case, it restricts the type of fence that can be constructed on part of the property. If there is a restrictive covenant regarding fencing registered on a property it will be registered against every lot within the same phase of subdivision. Every property within that phase of subdivision that is listed in the document has the ability but not the obligation to enforce the restrictive covenant through the courts. Generally speaking, the Town does not have the ability to enforce the specific provisions of a fencing restrictive covenant.
The Town’s means of taking enforcement action on fences is through municipal bylaws. The Land Use Bylaw limits some aspects of fences, including the height of a fence but not the specific design, and the Nuisance and Unsightly Premises Bylaw, which speaks to certain standards that properties should adhered to. If someone feels that an existing private fence has become unsightly, they can contact Okotoks Municipal Enforcement at 403-938-8913 to investigate.
Question: I also wish to know the cost of the new library building and what the current debt is on it, and perhaps the structuring of the repayment.
Answer: The costs allocated to the new Library portion is $10M. There is no debt for the Town associated with the Arts and Learning Campus Project.
More information is available on the Town webpage here; and specifically the FAQ’s tab explains the grant funding received for this project in more detail here.
The total project had a budget approval for $23.5M.
The Town’s share had a budget approval for $18.5M.
Question: Regarding affordable housing, can you tell me how many multi-family housing projects are planned right now in the new areas, specifically D’Arcy and Wedderburn, and also how many units will be in those projects. I’m look for numbers on both at-market value projects and below market value projects.
Answer:
D'Arcy and Wedderburn
In D’Arcy, the Outline Plan identifies five large sites where multi-residential developments are likely. Although the zonings have changed from when these outline plans were adopted with the adoption of our new Land Use Bylaw, the larger multi-res areas are identified as brown, dark orange and parts of the red areas will be a mix of residential and commercial.
Currently, the Town is working on a partnership affordable housing development with the Brenda Stafford Foundation and Westwinds Communities in D’Arcy (site across from No Frills). It will also include market rental housing. This development will involve approximately 140 units total.
There is currently an application for fourteen additional multi-residential townhomes in D’Arcy along Iris Crescent (similar to the townhomes along D’Arcy Boulevard).
Administration expects additional applications in D’Arcy for multi-residential developments in D’Arcy for the other noted sites in the coming 12-18 months.
Wedderburn anticipates a number of multi-residential sites in the coming year as well through its outline plan.
18 units of bungalow row houses were recently approved in Wedderburn.
Additional Projects of Note:
There is currently pre-application work in progress on a project in Town that will provide approximately 65 units, of which a portion will be below-market rents. As formal application has not yet been made, no further details can be provided yet.
A project in Drake Landing was recently approved (by the traffic circle) for 70 units, 10 of which be owned by Westwinds Communities which will be rented for 20% below market for a period of 25 years.
Additional Recent Policy and Regulatory Changes:
The recently adopted new Municipal Development Plan (MDP) (page 111) requires developers of new neighbourhoods to provide at least 40% of the total proposed housing as units other than single-detached housing stock to meet the need for housing choice and affordability. This means that the long-range plans currently worked on by developers with the Town will be required to provide significantly more multi-residential developments than communities in the past.
The recently approved Land Use Bylaw (LUB) allows for much more flexibility for a range of housing types throughout Okotoks neighbourhoods. For example, previously where only single-detached houses could be built, the zoning of Traditional Neighbourhoods now allows for duplexes, triplexes, fourplexes and a much greater range of options for builders to increase diversity
The new LUB also loosens the rules for secondary suites, not requiring parking and other regulatory barriers that prevented this dwelling form from being built previously in Okotoks.
Question: How many people/families in Okotoks are currently benefitting from subsidized housing/rent assistance, and if there is a waiting list for any of these services?
Answer: As the Town does not manage subsidized housing, you would need to reach out to local housing providers such as West Winds Communities to ask those providers this question.
Question: How many people have taken advantage of the secondary suite grant or how many suites have been created for rent from this program?
Answer: To date, two property owners have received grant funds after successfully developing a secondary suite in line with the program requirements. A third application has been pre-qualified for grant funds which are payable upon completion of the secondary suite in accordance with the program terms and timelines. This is a brand new program that was just launched in June so it will take some time to see the full impact. Details on this program can be found here.
Question: Where can I find the financial statements for the Centennial Centre?
Answer: There are no financial statements for the Foothills Centennial Centre (FCC). The FCC revenue and expenses are integrated into Community Services.
The Annual Report (page 120) contains the financial information for the “Recreation and Culture” division of which the FCC.
Question: Where can I find the 10 year capital plan?
Answer: The 2021 Approved 10 Year Capital Plan can be found here.
The 2020 November Budget Meetings in detail can be found here and scrolling down to the heading "Past Meetings" and expanding the "Annual Budget Meetings" tab to view the discussions, and budget documents in more detail. Tab 5 is the 10 year capital plan under the 2020 Annual Budget Meeting documents.
Question: I'd love to highlight how the Healthy Okotoks Coalition was able to get Okotoks designated as a bee friendly city. I think it's a great representation on how a group of citizens can work together on a small project to make a big impact in their community. Personally, I am thrilled Okotoks has received that designation. Pollinators are so important to our ecosystems.
Would anyone from the coalition be able to do a quick write up on how and why they approached council with the idea on making Okotoks a bee friendly city please?
Answer: Becoming a Bee City was a collaborative endeavor between the Healthy Okotoks Coalition and the Town of Okotoks. The Healthy Okotoks Coalition (HOC) spearheaded the idea, was engaged with the Bee City initiative from the beginning and was quick to identify new pollinator friendly ideas. This group of community volunteers frequently partner with the Town of Okotoks to support initiatives or working groups that focus on building a healthier community. The HOC manages the Okotoks Community Garden which was “bee friendly” long before the Bee City application and continues to ensure pollinator friendly plants are grown each year. The HOC was keen to support the Town’s application to be recognized as a Bee City and continues to have a working interest in supporting pollinator friendly projects.
Question: Now that the federal election is over, but the candidates have until Nov 5th to apply are we allowed to put our signs in the public locations that the Federal signs were?
Answer: Candidates are permitted to post candidate signage in the marked public signage corrals as of noon on September 20, 2021.
Public signage corrals are marked in the schedule on the election signage guidelines and have been staked out by the Town.
Question: On one hand: some residential home-owners are under the impression they can only have 1 Candidate for Councilor sign on their property. (It just does seem fair if this is the case- that the town is restricting/interfering with the democratic process of a residential home-owner in showing support for multiple Candidates.)
Yet on the other hand: some residential home-owners are under the impression they can have up to 6 Candidates for Councilor signs on their property.
And on the 3rd hand: some residential home-owners are under the impression they can have all 24 Candidates for Councilor signs on their lawn.
So my question for clarification - which of the above is it?
Answer: As in the September 8 and 9 signage emails, Okotoks Municipal Enforcement will allow one sign from each candidate on commercial properties (up to all 27 candidates), as long as the candidate has permission and it does not cause a safety issue. The ability to post more than one sign on commercial properties will afford more visibility for candidate signage and most commercial properties can accommodate more than one sign. The public signage corrals marked are open to candidate signs as of September 20 which provides greater visibility for candidates and I encourage candidates to post a sign in each corral.
Unfortunately residential properties are allowed only one sign under the guidelines. The Town has received complaints over the number of signs and appearance of the Town. The Town is asking candidates to follow the guidelines and balance the ability for candidates to post signage and listen to resident concerns over the number of signs in Town.
Question: For the debates what are the rules for vaccinations status to attend? Will proof be needed for entry for candidates and public?
Answer: Okotoks Chamber of Commerce runs and hosts all candidate forums. The Chamber is having a meeting today to decide how the forums will be conducted in light of the new Covid restrictions. The Chamber will be communicating directly with candidates on Friday with what is required and the finalized plan.
As the Chamber is hosting and running this event, you can contact the Chamber directly with any questions.
Question: Could you point me to where candidates can find contracts between the town and service providers? Where tenders to bid can be seen and how much has been paid upon completion of these contracts? I’ve been asked by several residents about who and how companies get contracts for work. Example: Bowmark paving, KC Landscaping. How many contracts have they had and where can people see how much they were paid, where they can find the details about these projects that they are seen at working.
Answer: The procurement processes of municipalities are highly regulated. All municipalities are bound by trade agreements that regulate how a municipality does business which includes:
The Canadian Free Trade Agreement (CFTA) which came into effect on July 1, 2017, is an agreement between the federal, provincial and territorial governments, found here, and replaces the Agreement on Internal Trade AIT) as of July 1, 2017.
There are a number of other International Trade Agreements that the federal government is responsible for the negotiation that may also impact the processes municipalities must follow and include the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and others.
One of the key principles of all trade agreements is that municipalities are not allowed to discriminate or give preferential treatment to local businesses. There must not be any preferential treatment of a province's people, investments and goods or services, except for any justified actual cost-of-service differences.
Another key piece for compliance with the trade agreements is that the Town is required to post opportunities to do business over certain thresholds. The Town does this through the two following methods:
As a general rule, the Town does not release the contracts between the Town and their suppliers as it can release unit costing that may allow competitive business knowledge that can be used to another competitors advantage. This information is protected information under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FOIP). The criteria and the awarding of contracts process is publicly available here.
If you are specifically requesting the information on how much has been paid to a specific contractor, we would need you to specify that request with a name and project.
Question: Residents of the Westmount area have told me that they are feeling unheard in the development process of the subdivision that is being built beside their neighborhood. They don't understand why the developer keeps holding town halls but doesn't take into account the suggestions they are providing. They are concerned about the plans for a major thoroughfare that will be going through their neighborhood. What else can they do or what obligations does the developer/town have to listen to their concerns?
Answer: All of the lands west of Westmount and Westridge are contained within the West Okotoks Area Structure Plan (WOASP). This plan provides high-level direction for long term development of the area and was adopted by Council. The Developer of the quarter section immediately west of Westridge is in the process of preparing the more detailed Neighbourhood Area Structure Plan (NASP), which will guide the specific location of individual roads, parks, and specific land uses. The developer is undertaking preliminary public participation on the plan at this time and has not formally submitted their application so there will continue to be engagement opportunities in the process and ultimately, the NASP will be subject to Council consideration and approval through a public hearing process.
The Developer’s consulting team is required to provide the Town all of the public feedback they receive and that feedback is considered through the review and planning process. Although it may appear that feedback is not considered, it is important to note that all comments are considered in the context of higher level planning policies of the Town, including the Municipal Development Plan and the WOASP, the technical analysis of professional consultants, constraints with land and existing development, and the differing perspectives of the public. As such, not every comment from the public will result in plan changes but will be considered. The transportation network is an example where a analysis is being done to try and best manage access to the new neighbourhood while minimalizing the impact of additional traffic in existing neighbourhoods.
The Developer’s consulting team has setup a website to distribute information about the proposed development here. However, if any individuals have any concerns or questions on the planning process, they can contact Community Growth and Investment directly through the website or at (403) 995-2760.
The WOSAP is available online here.
Question: I have talked to a resident who is concerned about on street parking and people leaving their cars in front of his house for weeks at a time. He has called municipal enforcement but they are not ticketing the vehicles. He understands that the streets are public but does not understand why people can leave their cars in front of his house without moving them for more than 72 hours as that is the current bylaw. Is there anything else he can do?
Answer: Okotoks Municipal Enforcement (OME) will not issue tickets on the first offence. Unfortunately OME does not have the capacity to monitor the movement of vehicles on the road proactively. This resident can follow-up with contacting OME and file complaints regarding vehicles not moving on the road and OME will continue to manage this issue.
Question: I have quite a few residents asking if the ballots require them to choose 6 people for council OR can they just choose one or two (people they know). With so many candidates, I keep hearing that people are confused, do not know six they want to choose, but will their ballot be spoiled if they only choose the one, two, or however many they know and want in council?
Answer: Electors have the ability to vote for any number of councillors up to 6 without spoiling their ballot. Electors are more than welcome to vote only for one or two councillors, if that is their wish, and their ballot will be valid.
Question: Is there any chance of availability for a morning or two added for Advanced Polls. I have received comments regarding the same as I am speaking to the Electorate.
Answer: Unfortunately, no further changes can be made to advance voting dates and times at this late date. There are a number of advance weekend voting opportunities and Election Day voting starts at 6 a.m. The normal opening of voting on Election Day is 10 a.m. but Okotoks has passed a bylaw to permit voting on Election Day to start 4 hours earlier. I encourage voters who want to vote in early morning to attend the voting station early on Election Day as historically attendance is very low to minimal during this time.
Question: How many Okotoks Municipal Enforcement (OME) officers are on duty from 6 pm to midnight?
Answer: OME has 1 officer working between 6 pm and midnight. On a fully staffed day (e.g. no vacations, training, or illnesses) OME has 1 officer on from 6am to 6pm, 1 officer on from 8am to 6pm and 1 officer that works from 6 pm to midnight. Additionally there is a supervisor working Monday to Thursday or Tuesday to Friday 8 am to 6 pm who assists the team as needed while also doing compliance and supervisory related tasks. For example at full staffing on a Wednesday we would have 3 officers working plus a road supervisor on from noon to 6 pm then we would drop to one officer from 6 pm to midnight. Scheduling is set up this way to facilitate calls for service and maximize staff for that purpose.
Question: I am getting some questions regarding the voting for school board trustee. Can you please provide some details on how this works for voters. Will they vote in both school division elections? If not, how do they know which election they vote in?
Answer: An elector is required to indicate which school board they would like a ballot for - separate or public. According to the Education Act an elector is deemed to be a resident of the separate school district if they reside within the boundaries of the separate school district and are of the same faith as the those who established the separate school district (Christ the Redeemer). All other electors are of the public school district. If an elector is unsure it may help to know what school board they support on their property tax. If an elector does not know which school board their taxes are paid to, they will be provided with a public school ballot (Foothills).
Question: How many RCMP officers work in the Town of Okotoks? I'd be curious to find that out as well ? I trust that that OME's are on Okotoks payroll and that RCMP are not ... correct ?
Answer: The Town of Okotoks has a contract with the Royal Canadian Mounted Police to provide policing services. Currently there is provision of 25 RCMP officers dedicated to the Town of Okotoks. RCMP officers are not employees of the Town and the Town is invoiced for RCMP services on a quarterly basis. This cost is shown as a contract service from other government. Administrative staff for the RCMP are Town employees (i.e. front counter staff).
Okotoks Municipal Enforcement (OME) officers and related OME administrative staff are employees of the Town.
Question: I have been researching the cost of electricity to recharge a Tesla, and despite the differences in battery sizes, range, etc., the consensus seems quite a bit more costly than you have indicated in your answers to me. Seeing how I have observed quite a bit of use of our facilities to recharge these cars, I wish to know if there are specific meters associated with each station and if the results reported to me are accurate. Who is the town official that provided you with the answers to me? Do the newest stations at the Library have meters to show how much "free" electricity has been provided by Okotoks taxpayers?
Answer: The division responsible for the oversight for EV chargers –Community Growth and Sustainability-provided the previous answers in response to your questions. I have confirmed the numbers are accurate as tracked through special software. The new chargers installed at the Arts and Learning Campus Town will also be tracked but we do not have any updated numbers at this time. I have included the previous response on this issue below for your reference:
“The Municipal Charging Stations were received as an Economic Development initiative to attract EV drivers to Okotoks’ Historic Downtown. The agreement with SunCountry stipulates that they own the chargers, which are on free loan to the Town of Okotoks with the stipulation that the Town provides electricity free of charge. Installation Costs would have been minimal, as the charging stations were provided at no cost and the installation was completed by municipal staff. It was brought forward as an Economic Development Initiative.
The total annual cost for electricity at both stations together was approximately $350 in the most recent 12 month period. This is 50% higher than the previous 12 month period (presumably due to COVID and fewer people going out in 2020), but similar to 2019. The Town’s total electrical costs for EV chargers over 4 years is approximately $1000, which is equivalent to the cost of purchasing one level 2 charging station.
The Town of Okotoks procures electricity in bulk for Town use and therefore pays significantly less than the current individual residential market rate.
Watch for more EV chargers coming out over the next few years; in response to a growing demand from EV drivers who are coming to Okotoks to spend their money. the next wave of grants supports a pay-per-use rapid charger installation program as an exciting revenue generating project for the Town”.
Question: Signage seems to be getting worse and worse. I frequently see signs in town property in unpermitted spaces, as well as multiple copies of the same sign on residential property. Is the Town going to start removing them? Leaving them up provides an unfair advantage for candidates that are not following the rules, and it seems there are no consequences. Also, there are some signs next to Hwy 2A north of 338 Ave. both northbound and southbound and they are right next to the road and could pose a danger to drivers. Are those to be removed by the town?
Answer: Candidates please abide by the signage provisions as previously shared in emails as noted below:
“As in the September 8 and 9 signage emails, Okotoks Municipal Enforcement will allow one sign from each candidate on commercial properties (up to all 27 candidates), as long as the candidate has permission and it does not cause a safety issue. The ability to post more than one sign on commercial properties will afford more visibility for candidate signage and most commercial properties can accommodate more than one sign. The public signage corrals marked are open to candidate signs as of September 20 which provides greater visibility for candidates and I encourage candidates to post a sign in each corral.
Unfortunately residential properties are allowed only one sign under the guidelines. The Town has received complaints over the number of signs and appearance of the Town. The Town is asking candidates to follow the guidelines and balance the ability for candidates to post signage and listen to resident concerns over the number of signs in Town.”
Please do not post any signage without permission of the property owner and all signage must be posted within the property line- not on the green space between the sidewalk and street or on the public boulevard.
As Returning Officer, I am responsible for conducting the election process. Complaints regarding signage compliance can be made directly to Okotoks Municipal Enforcement by calling 403-938-8913.
Question: Can you please tell me what the utility franchise fee increases have been from 2014 though 2021 (i.e. the last two terms of Council)?
Answer: Franchise Fee Bylaw 27-18 and amending Bylaw 33-20 set out the franchise fee rates.
From Bylaw 27-18
From Bylaw 33-20
Question: Can you tell me if the CMRB has approved the proposed Okotoks/Foothills County water pipeline? Does the CMRB have jurisdiction to veto the proposed water pipeline?
Answer: The CMRB does not have jurisdiction over the proposed water pipeline and CMRB approval is not required on servicing implementation.
Question: Can you tell me if there are any offence provisions for a candidate removing another candidate’s campaigning materials from a private residence?
Answer: There are no specific offence provisions under the Local Authorities Election Act for these types of actions. The Town would respectfully ask that candidates and campaign workers do not engage in this type of activity. The Town has received complaints from witnesses that this type of behavior is taking place. Witnesses have viewed these behaviours as highly upsetting and unethical.
Question: Can you please confirm for me the exact process on confirmation of my scrutineers for the advance polls?
Answer: It would be most helpful for candidates to contact the Returning Officer, Cathy Duplessis, with the names of your proposed scrutineers by 4 pm tomorrow on October 8, 2021 (one hour prior to the first Advance Vote). If this is not possible, scrutineers will need to have a written letter signed by the candidate that they are acting as a scrutineer on a candidate’s behalf. All scrutineers prior to being permitted to observe in a voting station will need to sign/affirm to the official form and confirm their identity. Only one person is allowed to observe at a time in the voting station, representing a candidate, whether that is the candidate, official agent or scrutineer.
Question: Can a scrutineer represent more than one candidate at a time?
Answer: Yes, but we will need to have this confirmed in writing from the candidate that a scrutineer is representing more than one candidate.
Question: Does the municipal election results get posted somewhere the evening of the 18th? What is the best way to find out the results the moment they are decided?
Answer: All the results will be compiled after 8 pm on October 18 at the Foothills Centennial Centre (FCC). As a candidate if you are present at the voting station at the FCC prior to the close at 8 pm you can watch us compile the tabulator results.
We will post the results at the FCC on the wall at the exact same time as we upload the results to the Town website.
Question: What is the process to request a recount by the Returning Officer and/or a judicial review of the election results?
Answer: Section 98(1)(a) of the Local Authorities Election Act (LAEA) outlines the process for requesting a recount from the returning officer. A recount request must be made to the returning officer within 44 hours after the close of the voting stations. This means any request for a recount must be made prior to 4 pm on Wednesday, October 20, 2021. If you wish to request a recount, as per the LAEA, a candidate, official agent or scrutineer who was present during an advance vote or on election day must, as part of his or her request for a recount, provide reasonable grounds alleging that the election results at any voting station is inaccurate in order to be considered by the returning officer. If the returning officer considers the grounds for the request reasonable, a recount may be conducted of the votes cast at one or more voting stations where the inaccuracy occurred.
Under section 103(1) of the LAEA, any time within 19 days after election day, any elector may apply to the Court for a recount, after the elector has filed an affidavit with the Clerk of the Court alleging reasonable grounds for believing that the returning officer or a deputy or other officer presiding at the voting station, in counting the ballots given at the election, improperly counted or rejected ballots, and have paid $300, as security for the payment of costs and expenses for this judicial recount.
A candidate or scrutineer may request a recount by the returning officer and apply for a recount by the Court if they believe they have reasonable grounds as noted above under the LAEA.
Question: How do the tabulators work to collect and total the ballots? How do I know that the tabulators are reading the ballots correctly?
Answer: The tabulators undergo a Logic and Accuracy testing process conducted by the election officers appointed by the Town. All tabulators and memory cards are tested by feeding a ballot for each candidate for all ballots types through each tabulator. The results for each tabulator’s memory cards are uploaded to a special results laptop. All the testing forms and testing ballots are signed off and sealed by the election officers who have conducted the Logic and Accuracy testing along with the paper trail confirming the auditing. All the testing can be recreated and confirmed if any review is required.
At all the voting stations, ballots from electors are fed through the tabulator while the elector is present and the elector can confirm the tabulator has read and cast the ballot. Over the last 3 advance vote dates, we have had some ballots noted for over-voting. Over-voting is flagged by the tabulator and a message stating an over-vote appears on the LED screen. At that time, we ask the voter if they would like a replacement ballot. If they would like a replacement ballot (which most voters will take) the over-voted ballot is counted as spoiled.
A ballot will not be accepted by the tabulator if it cannot read the circle that was filled in by the elector for a candidate.
Question: Just so I am clear on this process, are you stating here that:
Answers:
Sections of the LAEA
Recount by Returning Officer Section 98
Recount
98(1) The returning officer may make a recount of the votes cast at one or more voting stations if
(a) a candidate or an official agent or a scrutineer of a candidate recognized pursuant to section 69 or, in the case of a vote on a bylaw or question, a scrutineer appointed pursuant to section 70(1) shows grounds that the returning officer considers reasonable for alleging that the record of the result of the count of votes at any voting station is inaccurate,
(b) the returning officer considers that the number of
(i) valid ballots objected to, or
(ii) rejected ballots other than those on which no vote has been cast by an elector,
was sufficient to affect the result of the election if they had not been counted or rejected, as the case may be, or
(c) the returning officer is of the opinion that there may have been an administrative or technical error that may cause an error in the count of votes.
(2) If the returning officer makes a recount, the returning officer shall
(a) 12 hours before the recount, notify
(i) any candidates who may be affected by the recount or, in the case of a vote on a bylaw or question, one scrutineer in support of the passage of the bylaw or voting in the affirmative on the question and one scrutineer in opposition to the passage of the bylaw or voting in the negative on the question, and
(ii) those officers that the returning officer considers necessary to assist in the recount,
(b) break the seal of the ballot box, and
(c) proceed to count the ballots contained in it in the same manner as the deputy presiding at the voting station is directed to do.
(3) After the recount, the returning officer shall
(a) correct the ballot account if necessary,
(b) place in the ballot box all the documents contained in it at the time the returning officer broke the seal, and
(c) close the ballot box and seal it with the returning officer’s seal.
(4) An application under this section may be made during the 44 hours immediately following the closing of the voting stations but may not be made afterwards.
(5) The returning officer shall complete the recount
(a) in the case of an election other than a vote on a bylaw or question, prior to the time set for the declaration of the results under section 97(2), or
(b) in the case of a vote on a bylaw or question, within 96 hours of the close of the voting stations on election day.
(6) A declared vote under section 99 at the original count of ballots shall be counted at the recount of ballots only if the recount confirms the equality of votes among the same candidates as at the original count.
(7) If the recount results in an equality of votes different from the result of the original count and it is necessary to determine which candidate is elected, section 99 applies.
(8) If votes have been taken and counted under section 84, a reference in this section to a voting station is deemed to include the place where the votes were counted.
(9) If a returning officer determines that a recount will be made in a local jurisdiction that is divided into wards or divisions, the returning officer may determine the number of voting stations for which a recount is required in accordance with subsection (1).
RSA 2000 cL‑21 s98;2006 c22 s51;2012 c5 s117;2018 c23 s45
Court Recount Provision Section 103
Judicial recount application
103(1) At any time within 19 days after the close of the voting stations on election day, any elector may apply to the Court for a recount, after the elector has
(a) filed an affidavit with the clerk of the Court alleging reasonable grounds for believing that the returning officer or a deputy or other officer presiding at the voting station, in counting the ballots given at the election, improperly counted or rejected ballots, and
(b) deposited with the clerk of the Court $300 in cash, or by certified cheque or by money order, as security for the payment of costs and expenses.
(2) The deposit of $300 shall not be paid out by the clerk without the order of a judge.
Click the button below to learn more about what Town Council does.
The Town has created a Civility Charter that describes the behaviour and communication for residents and staff. We appreciate your cooperation in following these guidelines for respectful behaviour:
THORN, Tanya
POTRIE, Rodney Rene
HALLMARK, Oliver
NIX, Ryan
STIEBEN, Glenn